Re: archive links broken?

Magnus,

* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On 04/03/2017 09:43 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
> >> <mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161206034955(dot)bh3
> >> 3paeralxbtluv(at)alap3(dot)anarazel(dot)de
> >> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161206034955(dot)bh
> >> 33paeralxbtluv(at)alap3(dot)anarazel(dot)de>
> >>
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161208213441(dot)k3m
> >> bno4twhg2qf7g(at)alap3(dot)anarazel(dot)de
> >> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161208213441(dot)k3
> >> mbno4twhg2qf7g(at)alap3(dot)anarazel(dot)de>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, those links are clearly incorrect.
> >>
> >> The part that you're not telling us is where you found them...
> >>
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170402225015.GC10244@fetter.org
>
> I only see a single link like that in there,
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/63201ef9-26fb-3f1f-664d-98531678cebc(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com,
> and it works fine.
>
> The links you've listed above don't appear there AFAICT? (searching for
> /message-id/)

There's a few that point to postgr.es:

Under 'Suppress implicit-conversion warnings seen':

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170220141239(dot)GD12278(at)e733(dot)localdomain
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2839(dot)1490714708(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us

Do we have some hack to avoid screwing up links for
postgresql.org/message-id that needs to be updated to also look at
postgr.es/m/ links..?

Thanks!

Stephen