Re: SERIALIZABLE with parallel query

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Date: 2017-04-03 18:41:10
Message-ID: 20170403184110.ir7dn4n5dv6xwysn@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2017-03-11 15:19:23 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Here is a rebased patch.

It seems that this patch is still undergoing development, review and
performance evaluation. Therefore it seems like it'd be a bad idea to
try to get this into v10. Any arguments against moving this to the next
CF?

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven R. Kunze 2017-04-03 18:44:08 Re: [PATCH] few fts functions for jsonb
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-04-03 18:34:38 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort