Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Date: 2017-04-03 17:55:13
Message-ID: 20170403175512.GM9812@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres,

* Andres Freund (andres(at)anarazel(dot)de) wrote:
> I don't fundamentally disagree with anything here, but I think it'd be a
> serious mistake to link this to the conversion of the pg_upgrade tests
> to tap tests.

I agree that we should move forward with that conversion, regardless of
the rest of this discussion.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-03 18:19:18 Re: identity columns
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-04-03 17:54:24 Re: [BUGS] BUG #14600: Passwords in user mappings leaked by psql \deu+ command