Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date: 2017-03-30 15:41:14
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2017-03-30 16:43:41 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> Looks like OID conflict to me.. Please try rebased set.

Pavan, Alvaro, everyone: I know you guys are working very hard on this,
but I think at this point it's too late to commit this for v10. This is
patch that's affecting the on-disk format, in quite subtle
ways. Committing this just at the end of the development cyle / shortly
before feature freeze, seems too dangerous to me.

Let's commit this just at the beginning of the cycle, so we have time to
shake out the bugs.

- Andres

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-30 15:45:51 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless)
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2017-03-30 15:26:05 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.