From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hash support for grouping sets |
Date: | 2017-03-23 18:42:43 |
Message-ID: | 20170323184243.bpl75essdwwzkilo@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-03-23 03:43:57 +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>
> Andres> Changes to advance_aggregates() are, in my experience, quite
> Andres> likely to have performance effects. This needs some
> Andres> performance tests.
> [...]
> Andres> Looks like it could all be noise, but it seems worthwhile to
> Andres> look into some.
>
> Trying to sort out signal from noise when dealing with performance
> impacts of no more than a few percent is _extremely hard_ these days.
Indeed. But that doesn't mean we needn't try. With some determination
and profiling you can often sepearate signal from noise - I managed to
track down 0.12% regressions in the expression evaluation work...
> I will go ahead and do this, out of sheer curiosity if nothing else,
> but the preliminary results suggest there's probably nothing worth
> holding up the patch for.
Agreed. I'd want to run one more profile, checking whether the profiles
indicate new hotspots, but other than that...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2017-03-23 18:46:39 | Re: Hash support for grouping sets |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2017-03-23 18:35:49 | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |