| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage |
| Date: | 2017-03-20 12:33:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20170320123302.GF9812@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert,
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> So was this 3340 line patch posted or discussed anyplace before it got
> committed?
I've mentioned a few times that I'm working on improving pg_dump
regression tests and code coverage, which is what these were. I'm a bit
surprised that it's, apparently, a surprise to anyone or that strictly
adding regression tests in the existing framework deserves very much
discussion.
What I think would be great would be some additional work on our code
coverage, which is abysmal. This, at least, gets us up over 80% for
src/bin/pg_dump, but there's still quite a bit of work to be done there,
as noted in the commit message, and lots of opportunity for improvement
throughout the rest of the code base, as https://coverage.postgresql.org
shows.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-20 13:07:06 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-20 11:48:09 | Re: pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-03-20 12:55:09 | Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-20 12:32:54 | Re: logical replication access control patches |