Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date: 2017-03-13 19:34:03
Message-ID: 20170313193403.rq5pmpovoswd65cv@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner wrote:

> >> What is necessary to indicate an additional SQL feature covered?
> >
> > I assume you're talking about information_schema.sql_features
>
> I had forgotten we had that in a table. I was thinking more of the docs:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/features.html
>
> I guess if we change one, we had better change the other. (Or are
> they generated off a common source?)

See src/backend/catalog/sql_features.txt

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-13 19:45:01 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add amcheck extension to contrib.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-13 19:24:30 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables