Re: Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE
Date: 2017-03-11 03:24:48
Message-ID: 20170311032448.GB19616@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:06:56PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > (And no, I don't especially
> > approve of RELKIND_SEQUENCE being 'S' either, but it's far too late to
> > change that.)
>
> FWIW the reason SEQUENCE uses S instead of 's' is that the latter was
> taken for "special" relations, which we removed a few releases ago
> (commit 3a694bb0a1).

Ah! I knew there was a reason for 'S', but couldn't remember it. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Ridge 2017-03-11 04:31:16 Re: How to get the 'ctid' from a record type?
Previous Message Mengxing Liu 2017-03-11 03:12:05 [GSOC 17] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions