Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Gorman <johngorman2(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Date: 2017-03-02 06:19:30
Message-ID: 20170302061930.ofjfbecdbdchn76s@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-03-02 04:36:23 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I've noticed two minor typos:
>
> 1) That is solved this by creating ...
> - extra "this"
>
> 2) Given this, routines like pfree their corresponding context ...
> - missing "find" or "determine"

Will fix.

> I also see you've explicitly mentioned the callbacks were added in 9.5.
> Doesn't that somewhat reintroduce the historical account?

That section I just moved up, the version reference was there before. I
left it in, because it seemed new enough to still be somewhat
relevant; removed and added it, not sure what's better.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-03-02 06:21:13 Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-03-02 06:18:08 Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0