| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ANALYZE command progress checker |
| Date: | 2017-03-01 19:34:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20170301193448.GE14166@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:28:23AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-03-01 10:25:49 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > We now have a framework for this [1] (currently used by vacuum, but
> > extensible). The question is about presentation. I'm fairly sure that
> > we shouldn't just add yet another framework, and I doubt that that's
> > what's proposed by Peter.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=c16dc1aca5e
>
> Majority of that is actually in
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=b6fb6471f6afaf649e52f38269fd8c5c60647669
If that's even vaguely usable, I'd say we should use it for this.
I notice that that commit has no SGML component. Should it have one?
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-01 19:38:40 | Re: ANALYZE command progress checker |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-01 19:19:36 | Re: timeouts in PostgresNode::psql |