| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion |
| Date: | 2017-02-28 04:53:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20170228045317.GE9812@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Kyotaro HORIGUCHI (horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp) wrote:
> I suppose it is for suggesting what kind of word should come
> there, or avoiding silence for a tab. Or for symmetry with other
> types of manipulation, like DROP. Another possibility is creating
> multiple objects with similar names, say CREATE TABLE
> employee_x1, CREATE TABLE employee_x2. Just trying to complete
> existing *schema* is one more another possible objective.
I don't buy any of these arguments either. I *really* don't want us
going down some road where we try to make sure that hitting 'tab' never
fails...
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-02-28 04:54:26 | Re: help to identify the reason that extension's C function returns array get segmentation fault |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-02-28 04:52:17 | Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode |