Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Date: 2017-02-20 11:04:56
Message-ID: 20170220110456.2jupmfhxlizykmmc@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-02-20 11:58:12 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> That being said, I did wonder myself if we should just deprecate float
> timestamps as well.

I think we need a proper deprecation period for that, given that the
conversion away will be painful for pg_upgrade using people with big
clusters. So I think we should fix this regardless... :(

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2017-02-20 11:21:58 pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir()
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-02-20 10:58:12 Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster