Re: Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2017-02-17 16:39:49
Message-ID: 20170217163949.6kzv3o4gtwtr2hlz@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Keith Fiske wrote:

> I can understandable if it's simply not possible, but if it is, I think in
> any cases of data corruption, having some means to check for it to be sure
> you're in the clear would be useful.

Maybe it is possible. I just didn't try, since it didn't seem very
useful.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-02-17 16:41:13 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new function dsa_allocate0.
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2017-02-17 16:31:42 Re: [PATCH] Add pg_disable_checksums() and supporting infrastructure