Re: CREATE TABLE with parallel workers, 10.0?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Chamberlain <josh(at)zephyri(dot)co>
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE with parallel workers, 10.0?
Date: 2017-02-16 01:41:03
Message-ID: 20170216014103.fcdxtfbk2w3smwn2@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-02-15 20:35:16 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Perhaps, but until we've got a system worked out for having the workers
> do the writes, we aren't getting anything. Being able to have the
> leader do the writes based on the tuples fed back from the workers is
> clearly better than nothing.

Never argued differently.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-16 01:45:41 Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-02-16 01:35:16 Re: CREATE TABLE with parallel workers, 10.0?