Re: Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitrary vacuum flags

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Seki, Eiji" <seki(dot)eiji(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitrary vacuum flags
Date: 2017-02-15 10:59:06
Message-ID: 20170215105906.6honezzknuc5objd@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Please persuade us with measurements that allowing this impact on
> > ANALYZE would really improve performance at least in your case, and
> > also examine the effect of this on the accuracy and usefulness of the
> > gathered statistics.
>
> FWIW, there was last week a developer meeting in Tokyo, and Seki-san
> has presented such measurements. So it is not like nothing exists in
> this area.

Sounds like it'd be a good idea to present these results to this list,
too.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2017-02-15 11:28:38 Re: SCRAM authentication, take three
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2017-02-15 10:58:22 Re: SCRAM authentication, take three