Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date: 2017-02-14 14:13:16
Message-ID: 20170214141316.2qprupx5qwcqzuzc@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:

> > Yes, I understand. I just mean that it could be done something like
> > this:
> >
> > #define PGXACTPadSize (PG_CACHE_LINE_SIZE - (offsetof(PGXACT, nxid) +
> > sizeof(uint8)))
>
> Yes, but I can't use such macro in the definition of PGXACT itself.

/me slaps forehead

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2017-02-14 14:14:42 Re: libpq Alternate Row Processor
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2017-02-14 13:59:00 Re: Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real