| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress |
| Date: | 2017-02-14 02:36:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20170214023639.pkk542hwk2e7gqbt@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-02-13 20:59:43 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2017-02-13 6:46 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> > > here is new update - check is done before any creating
> >
> > It may be better to do any checks before dropping existing databases
> > as well... It would be as well just simpler to complain with a single
> > error message like "database and template list lengths do not match".
> >
>
> next step
I still fail to see why --use-existing as suggested in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170208002900.vkldujzfkwbvqqq7@alap3.anarazel.de
isn't sufficient.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-14 02:46:52 | Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2017-02-14 02:32:43 | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |