Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2017-02-10 18:41:27
Message-ID: 20170210184127.q2ymsldbvbwxzblk@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-02-10 19:33:18 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I guess we wouldn't, but we'd still need the "replacement for autoconf"
> part. So then we're back to maintaining multiple buildsystems.

Hm? Do we really need that? Most of the things in an extension you do
*not* want to determine separately from the backend. It's not like pgxs
atm really allows to differ wildly from autoconf's results. And most of
the relevant determinations made by autoconf are available in headers
and/or we can generate a cmake include file with the results of
autoconf.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2017-02-10 18:41:57 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-02-10 18:41:00 Re: removing tsearch2