| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2017-02-06 17:14:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20170206171436.uoeaqjbbfbae3dyf@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Better to fix the callers so that they don't have the assumption you
> refer to. Or maybe we could adjust the API of RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap
> so that it returns all the sets needed by a given calling module at
> once, which would allow us to guarantee they're consistent.
Note that my "interesting attrs" patch does away with these independent
bitmaps (which was last posted by Pavan as part of his WARM set). I
think we should fix just this bug now, and for the future look at that
other approach.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2017-02-06 17:28:05 | Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-02-06 17:13:12 | Re: Cannot shutdown subscriber after DROP SUBSCRIPTION |