From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
Date: | 2017-02-01 06:25:43 |
Message-ID: | 20170201.152543.14165695.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, thank you for moving this to the next CF.
At Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:09:51 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqRFhUv+GX=eH1bo7xYHS79-gRj1ecu2QoQtHvX9RS=JYA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > Six new syscaches in 665d1fa was conflicted and 3-way merge
> > worked correctly. The new syscaches don't seem to be targets of
> > this patch.
>
> To be honest, I am not completely sure what to think about this patch.
> Moved to next CF as there is a new version, and no new reviews to make
> the discussion perhaps move on.
I'm thinking the following is the status of this topic.
- The patch stll is not getting conflicted.
- This is not a hollistic measure for memory leak but surely
saves some existing cases.
- Shared catcache is another discussion (and won't really
proposed in a short time due to the issue on locking.)
- As I mentioned, a patch that caps the number of negative
entries is avaiable (in first-created - first-delete manner)
but it is having a loose end of how to determine the
limitation.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-01 06:25:50 | Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: Steps inside ExecEndGather) |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-01 06:23:04 | Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) |