Re: asynchronous execution

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: asynchronous execution
Date: 2017-02-01 05:58:23
Message-ID: 20170201.145823.96342624.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you.

At Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:11:58 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqS0MhZrzgMVQeFEnnKABcsMnNULd8=O0PG7_h-FUp5aEQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > I noticed that this patch is conflicting with 665d1fa (Logical
> > replication) so I rebased this. Only executor/Makefile
> > conflicted.
>
> The patches still apply, moved to CF 2017-03. Be aware of that:
> $ git diff HEAD~6 --check
> contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c:388: indent with spaces.
> + PendingAsyncRequest *areq,
> contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c:389: indent with spaces.
> + bool reinit);
> src/backend/utils/resowner/resowner.c:1332: new blank line at EOF.

Thank you for letting me know the command. I changed my check
scripts to use them and it seems working fine on both commit and
rebase.

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-01 05:58:55 Re: Parallel Index Scans
Previous Message Kuntal Ghosh 2017-02-01 05:57:37 Re: WAL consistency check facility