Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date: 2017-01-31 05:20:48
Message-ID: 20170131052048.e5sqicfk5bmuamyo@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Heikki,

On 2016-11-22 10:56:07 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I attach V4 of amcheck.

Is there any chance you could look at the concurrency related parts of
amcheck? I'd like to push this to be mergeable, but that area is a bit
outside of my area of expertise...

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Sontakke 2017-01-31 05:34:26 Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-31 05:19:49 Refactoring of replication commands using printsimple