|From:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>|
|To:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: WIP: About CMake v2|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 2017-01-27 09:09:36 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> My preferred scenario would be to replace the Windows build system by
> this first, then refine it, then get rid of Autoconf.
> The ideal timeline would be to have a ready patch to commit early in a
> development cycle, then get rid of the Windows build system by the end
> of it. Naturally, this would need buy-in from Windows developers.
> I don't foresee replacing the Autoconf build system by this immediately.
I'm very strongly against this path, it seems way too likely that we'll
end up with yet another fragile thing that nobody from the *nix side
will be able to test.
|Next Message||Andres Freund||2017-01-27 23:13:38||Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal|
|Previous Message||Michael Paquier||2017-01-27 23:10:19||Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal|