| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests |
| Date: | 2017-01-26 21:46:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20170126214639.2ukhwucaelhdzetg@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > It is really quite annoying that the buildfarm doesn't do what stock
> > tests do. What about pushing a bit stronger for having these
> > optimizations as part of the standard build run, instead of being only
> > in the buildfarm client script?
>
> Huh? It's just a question of "make check" vs "make installcheck".
> They each have their uses.
The current problem is because the buildfarm uses a different database.
See https://postgr.es/m/e6084b89-07a7-7e57-51ee-d7b8fc9ec864@2ndQuadrant.com
(When I wrote the para quoted above, I thought this was for performance,
but now I realize it's not so. Anyway the point stands that buildfarm
does things differently.)
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-26 21:55:33 | Re: safer node casting |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-26 21:16:50 | Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests |