Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date: 2017-01-26 18:34:46
Message-ID: 20170126183446.eaz3lcukzchsagw5@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-01-26 13:16:13 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > OK, I have done this refactoring effort as attached because I think
> > that's really worth it. And here are the diff numbers:
> > 3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
> > That's a bit less than what I thought first because of all the
> > singularities of bytea in its output and the way TIMELINE_HISTORY
> > takes advantage of the message level routines. Still for
> > IDENTIFY_SYSTEM, START_REPLICATION and CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT the
> > gains in readability are here.
>
> Seems OK to me, but I think I'd want to hear a few other opinions
> before committing it.

Just to be absolutely sure: We're talking about Michael's cleanup patch,
not the thread's original topic?

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-01-26 18:38:53 Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscription
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-01-26 18:26:10 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal