Re: Checksums by default?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Checksums by default?
Date: 2017-01-21 14:03:02
Message-ID: 20170121140302.GA18360@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> Is it time to enable checksums by default, and give initdb a switch to turn
> it off instead?

Yes, please.

We've already agreed to make changes to have a better user experience
and ask those who really care about certain performance aspects to have
to configure for performance instead (see: wal_level changes), I view
this as being very much in that same vein.

I know one argument in the past has been that we don't have a tool that
can be used to check all of the checksums, but that's also changed now
that pgBackRest supports verifying checksums during backups. I'm all
for adding a tool to core to perform a validation too, of course, though
it does make a lot of sense to validate checksums during backup since
you're reading all the pages anyway.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-21 14:05:08 Re: Checksums by default?
Previous Message Andrew Borodin 2017-01-21 12:25:34 Re: Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree