Re: Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum
Date: 2017-01-19 19:11:12
Message-ID: 20170119191112.f3yfc4jcjzeyostx@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:

> After sleeping on this, I'm inclined to go with Amit's fix for now.
> It seems less likely to break anything in the back-branches than any
> other option I can think up.

Yeah, no objections here.

Note typo "imporatant" in the comment.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-19 19:18:23 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-01-19 19:08:49 Re: [PATCH] Fix minor race in commit_ts SLRU truncation vs lookups