| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling) |
| Date: | 2017-01-16 03:29:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20170116032952.z2re55hcfhzbkmrm@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-10-31 09:06:39 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-09-14 19:28:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > > On 2016-09-12 19:35:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Here's a draft patch that is just meant to investigate what the planner
> > changes might look like if we do it in the pipelined-result way.
> > Accordingly, I didn't touch the executor, but just had it emit regular
> > Result nodes for SRF-execution steps. However, the SRFs are all
> > guaranteed to appear at top level of their respective tlists, so that
> > those Results could be replaced with something that works like
> > nodeFunctionscan.
>
> > So I think we should continue investigating this way of doing things.
> > I'll try to take a look at the executor end of it tomorrow. However
> > I'm leaving Friday for a week's vacation, and may not have anything to
> > show before that.
>
> Are you planning to work on the execution side of things? I otherwise
> can take a stab...
Doing so now.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2017-01-16 04:14:51 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2017-01-16 02:38:26 | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |