| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Packages: Again |
| Date: | 2017-01-11 20:22:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20170111202250.GH8584@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:08:58PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:56:23PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >
> > >I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
> > >than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
> > >couldn't migrate an application that needed it. It wasn't a question of
> > >porting --- there was just no way to port it.
> > >
> > >Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.
> >
> > Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?
>
> Yes, they do based on the number of "I can't port from Oracle"
> complaints we used to get, perhaps related to exceptions. Once we had
> them, the complaints of that type disappeared.
Oh, I was talking about savepoints/nested-transactions, not autonomous
transactions.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-01-11 20:23:39 | Re: Packages: Again |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-01-11 20:16:07 | Re: pageinspect: Hash index support |