Re: proposal: session server side variables (fwd)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: session server side variables (fwd)
Date: 2017-01-07 23:46:55
Message-ID: 20170107234655.GA13329@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:45:24AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> <Argh, wrong sender again, sorry [again] for the repost.
> I must tweak my mail client configuration...>
>
> >>>Good. So we seem to agree that GUCS are transactional?
> >
> >I'm surprised, I never knew this.
>
> I must admit that it was also a (good) surprise for me.
>
> The documentation says it:
>
> """
> If SET (or equivalently SET SESSION) is issued within a transaction that is
> later aborted, the effects of the SET command disappear when the transaction
> is rolled back. Once the surrounding transaction is committed, the effects
> will persist until the end of the session, unless overridden by another SET.
> """
>
> But I have not found anything clear about user-defined parameters.

Uh, I think it is a missing feature, i.e.:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Administration
Have custom variables be transaction-safe

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4B577E9F.8000505@dunslane.net

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2017-01-08 00:13:31 Re: Increase pltcl test coverage
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2017-01-07 22:44:01 Re: Adding type info etc for inheritance errmsg: "child table is missing column ..."