Re: Replication/backup defaults

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Replication/backup defaults
Date: 2017-01-05 17:17:26
Message-ID: 20170105171726.5la2derl5inl4nww@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-01-05 09:12:49 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-01-05 18:08:36 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2017-01-05 08:38:32 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > I also suggest making the defaults for both 20 instead of 10. That
> > > > leaves enough room that almost nobody ever has to change them, whereas
> > > > 10 can be a bit tight for some not-outrageous installations (8 standbys
> > > > plus backup?).
> > >
> > > I'm afraid we need to add initdb integration / testing for those. I mean
> > > we have initdb test down to 10 connections to deal with limited
> > > resources...
> > >
> >
> > If we make both 10 by default we should be OK though, no?
>
> I'm a bit doubtful about that. On the other hand, we've increased
> max_parallel_workers without anybody complaining.

Err, I mean max_worker_processes.

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-01-05 17:24:26 Re: generating fmgr prototypes automatically
Previous Message Keith Fiske 2017-01-05 17:16:47 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take