Re: Duplicate node tag assignments

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Duplicate node tag assignments
Date: 2016-12-28 16:37:39
Message-ID: 20161228163739.75vziks2vnht6idb@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2016-12-28 11:33:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> By chance I happened to notice that the recent partition patch pushed
> us over the number of available node tags between
>
> T_A_Expr = 900,

> So I'm leaning to the second, more drastic, solution. Thoughts?

Alternatively we could add a -Wduplicate-enum/-Werror=duplicate-enum for
clang. That'd protect against that in all enums...

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cynthia Shang 2016-12-28 16:41:42 Re: [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-12-28 16:33:31 Duplicate node tag assignments