From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | mendola(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | ktm(at)rice(dot)edu, wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4 |
Date: | 2016-12-21 06:58:48 |
Message-ID: | 20161221.155848.27901916.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:32:19 +0000, Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAJycT5reA+q7X_czMFURfcSy-QNoycorEsTWySL1qoTFwyoxzg(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option.
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 15:30 Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4?
> > > Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point.
> > >
> > > The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it
> > > closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to
> > > cause it not to work any more.
> > >
> > > Anyone know? Or, alternatively, anyone have another option to get the
> > > same job done?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
> >
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > We are currently using it with 9.5.5 and it works well. I would expect
> > that it would work with 9.6 as well, but we have not tested it.
As more official statement, this page says that it supports PG9.5
as of 1.3.3.
http://pgxn.org/dist/pg_repack/doc/pg_repack.html
> pg_repack 1.3.3
> Added support for PostgreSQL 9.5
Latest version seems 1.3.4.
The requirements on the page looks somewhat stale.
> Requirements
> PostgreSQL versions
> PostgreSQL 8.3, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Zhou | 2016-12-21 07:17:56 | Re: How well does PostgreSQL 9.6.1 support unicode? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-21 05:24:17 | Re: How well does PostgreSQL 9.6.1 support unicode? |