| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Julian Markwort <julian(dot)markwort(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Valery Popov <v(dot)popov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol) |
| Date: | 2016-12-20 23:14:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20161220231439.GA18360@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David,
* David Fetter (david(at)fetter(dot)org) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 08:34:19AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Heikki Linnakangas (hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi) wrote:
> > > Even if you have a separate "verifier type" column, it's not fully
> > > normalized, because there's still a dependency between the
> > > verifier and verifier type columns. You will always need to look
> > > at the verifier type to make sense of the verifier itself.
> >
> > That's true- but you don't need to look at the verifier, or even
> > have *access* to the verifier, to look at the verifier type.
>
> Would a view that shows only what's to the left of the first semicolon
> suit this purpose?
Obviously a (security barrier...) view or a (security definer) function
could be used, but I don't believe either is actually a good idea.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-20 23:18:13 | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-20 23:01:33 | Re: too low cost of Bitmap index scan |