Re: Retire src/backend/port/dynloader/linux.c ?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Retire src/backend/port/dynloader/linux.c ?
Date: 2016-12-19 03:55:10
Message-ID: 20161219035510.4svp7dw2ghv4byj4@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-12-18 22:19:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Shouldn't we just remove that code?
>
> What for?

I every now and then end up looking at it for a few minutes, and wonder
what the hell dld is, just to see that it's old stuff.

> It's maintenance-free ... hasn't been touched since 2004.
> While I agree with you that it's *probably* dead code, it's hard to
> see much upside from removing it.
>
> If we want to get into arguing whether code is dead or not, there's
> an awful lot of potentially removable stuff in the tree, but I doubt
> it's worth the trouble to figure out what's really dead.

Well, it's sometimes annoying to hit the code while looking around
that's actually dead. But I don't feel that strongly.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-12-19 04:59:08 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-12-19 03:36:14 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6