Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution
Date: 2016-12-16 17:28:35
Message-ID: 20161216172835.bcux26trsu3fddww@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-12-16 11:41:49 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thoughts?
>
> Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this. If that
> makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that
> the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID().

I don't care about T_ID, but I do care about breaking extensions using
lwlocks like for the 3rd release in a row or such. This is getting a
bit ridiculous.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-16 17:32:49 Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-12-16 17:28:24 Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless