On 2016-12-16 11:41:49 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thoughts?
>
> Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this. If that
> makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that
> the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID().
I don't care about T_ID, but I do care about breaking extensions using
lwlocks like for the 3rd release in a row or such. This is getting a
bit ridiculous.