Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-12-08 04:39:42
Message-ID: 20161208043942.ekjvyf7ddbxehh7c@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-12-07 13:20:04 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> >> My bad. The fix I sent last night for one of the cache flush issues
> >> wasn't quite right. The attached seems to fix it.
> > Yes, fixed here too. Thanks.
>
> Thanks for the report - that was a good catch.

Congrats to everyone working on this! This is a large step forward.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-08 04:42:32 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-08 04:20:34 Re: Unlogged tables cleanup