Re: [PATCH] enhancements, pg_lsn helper, and some more recovery tests

From: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enhancements, pg_lsn helper, and some more recovery tests
Date: 2016-12-07 13:47:34
Message-ID: 20161207134734.GH11146@e733.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, Craig.

I noticed that these patches have a "Needs review" status and decided to
take a look. Surprisingly I didn't manage to find many defects.

* I like this idea in general;
* Code is test covered and documented well;
* All tests pass;
* No warnings during compilation and/or tests run;
* I didn't find any typos;
* Code style seems to be OK;

Though are you sure you want to name a class like_this instead of LikeThis?
It's quite uncommon in Perl code and usually used only for packages like
"strict" and "warnings". However I prefer no to insist on changes like
this since it's a matter of taste.

The bottom line --- this code looks good to me. If there is nothing you
would like to change in the last moment I suggest to change the status
to "Ready for committer".

Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-12-07 13:47:50 Re: patch: function xmltable
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-07 12:50:12 Re: Test "tablespace" fails during `make installcheck` on master-replica setup