| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
| Date: | 2016-12-01 22:44:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20161201224446.GW13284@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
All,
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> I think this is a straw man. We've already decided to use message-IDs
> as the basic identity of messages for this purpose; other proposals
> were considered before and rejected as too inconvenient.
I tend to agree with Tom on this, for better or worse, message-ID is
what we're using.
Further, we seem agreed that URLs are what we want to have in the
commits rather than just the message-ID.
The question on the table at the moment seems to be if we want to use
https://postgr.es/m/ or https://postgresql.org/message-id/ as the
prefix. Personally, I don't really care and would prefer we just decide
something and move on to more interesting technical discussion. I don't
really agree with the complaints levied against https://postgr.es/m/,
but I'm also not particularly bothered by one long line in each commit
message.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-01 22:44:54 | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-01 22:41:40 | Re: Parallel safety of CURRENT_* family |