Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Subject: Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump
Date: 2016-11-29 16:12:25
Message-ID: 20161129161225.GU13284@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Guillaume, Amul,

* Amul Sul (sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: tested, passed
> Implements feature: tested, passed
> Spec compliant: not tested
> Documentation: tested, passed
>
> Patch v6 looks good to me, passing to committer.
>
> Thanks !
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

I've pushed this patch. In the future if you are working with the
pg_dump TAP tests and add a new 'run', be sure to update the 'tests' to
indicate which tests should 'like' or 'unlike' that run. If you have
any questions, feel free to ask.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message btober@computer.org 2016-11-29 16:31:07 Re: Invoice Table Design
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2016-11-29 15:30:27 Re: Storing files: 2.3TBytes, 17M file count

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Convey 2016-11-29 16:16:29 Re: Tackling JsonPath support
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2016-11-29 16:09:52 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function