Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]
Date: 2016-11-29 04:25:33
Message-ID: 20161129042533.3hmovra3x2uufrj4@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-11-28 09:55:00 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think we should go with this approach. I don't think it's a good
> idea to have the heapam layer know about executor slots.

I agree that that's not pretty.

> Even though
> it's a little sad to pass up an opportunity for a larger performance
> improvement, this improvement is still quite good.

It's imo not primarily about a larger performance improvement, but about
avoid possible regressions. Doubling deforming of wide tuples will have
noticeable impact on some workloads. I don't think we can disregard
that.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-29 04:26:57 Re: pgsql: Add putenv support for msvcrt from Visual Studio 2013
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-29 04:24:52 Re: Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled