Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-11-25 03:11:58
Message-ID: 20161125031158.4kcxtv2pldcgirfe@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2016/11/25 4:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I think CREATE TABLE OF is pretty much a corner case. I agree that
> > allowing the constraint right after the constraint name is more
> > intuitive.
>
> I assume you meant "...right after the column name"?

Eh, right.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-25 03:54:37 Re: Broken SSL tests in master
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-11-25 03:10:13 Typo in comment