Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion
Date: 2016-11-25 06:14:27
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


At Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:51:43 +0100, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAFj8pRAm2CsafiH0CPxoWyTccJSm+y=TVgzq07gGS5ydS0qwCA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> I am sure about benefit of all patches - but it is lot of changes in one
> moment, and it is not necessary in this moment.
> patches 0004 and 0005 does some bigger mental changes, and the work can be
> separated.

The patches are collestions of sporadic changes on the same
basis. I agree that the result is too big too look at. (And the
code itself is confused) Please wait for a while for separated


Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-11-25 06:16:41 Re: Random PGDLLIMPORTing
Previous Message Mithun Cy 2016-11-25 06:11:29 Re: Broken SSL tests in master