Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions

Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 27 October 2016 at 00:42, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >> On 2016-09-23 16:04:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing
> >>> isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions.
> >>> I'm very much less excited about that idea. It'd be substantially more
> >>> dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful
> >>> to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API
> >>> and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use.
> >>
> >> FWIW, I'd be quite happy if it were installed. Running isolationtester
> >> when compiling extensions against distribution postgres packages would
> >> be quite useful.
> >
> > +1.
>
> Patch attached.

Hmm but this only installs isolationtester itself ... don't you need
pg_isolation_regress too?

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services