| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
| Date: | 2016-11-19 00:07:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20161119000731.GV13284@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus,
* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> It would make the URLs actually short, but as mentioned upthread, that
> wouldn't work at all if offline. So it'd be a tradeoff between those, but
> so are pretty much all other options that don't include the full message-id.
This is a bit of a crazy idea, but in the new list system, couldn't we
add a header which includes "our" surrogate message-id? Or possibly the
entire URL to the message, and maybe the URL for the entire thread?
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-11-19 00:09:17 | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-11-18 23:51:07 | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |