Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date: 2016-11-18 21:14:53
Message-ID: 20161118211453.akhis6ixxkav7mv6@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> IMO it's not, and closer analysis says that this patch series is an
> >>> attempt to solve something we already fixed, better, in 9.4.
> >
> >> ... by the same patch submitter.
> >
> > [ confused ] The commit log credits 82233ce7e to MauMau and yourself.
>
> IIUC, MauMau = Tsunakawa Takayuki.

Right, https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/964413269E3A41409EA53EE0D813E48C@tunaPC

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-11-18 21:15:31 Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-18 21:13:36 Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?