Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum
Date: 2016-11-17 16:37:57
Message-ID: 20161117163757.fi6hmpcbgq6gqlhr@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I am ready now to backpatch this to 9.4 and 9.5; here are the patches.
> They are pretty similar, but some adjustments were needed due to XLog
> format changes in 9.5. (I kept most of Simon's original commit
> message.)

Finally done.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-11-17 16:43:14 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Artur Zakirov 2016-11-17 16:27:31 [BUG?] pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands() error with ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION