Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Date: 2016-10-27 21:00:45
Message-ID: 20161027160045.24de13fe@slate.meme.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:57:18 +0200
Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:

> Re: Karl O. Pinc 2016-10-27 <20161027121141(dot)6bd95efd(at)slate(dot)meme(dot)com>
> > SELECT * from postgres.pg_current_logfile;

> We were discussing exactly that idea upthread before concluding that a
> function with a single return value is much easier to use.

Apologies for raising the dead this Halloween season. :)

Regards,

Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl O. Pinc 2016-10-27 21:18:02 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-10-27 20:38:24 Re: condition variables