|From:||Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>|
|To:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>|
|Subject:||Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
* Peter Eisentraut (peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> On 10/12/16 11:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The main problem we're trying to fix here is people thinking that
> > something with "log" in the name contains discardable data. Just
> > relocating the directory without renaming it won't improve that.
> I think it would help if we moved it to something like
> "internal/pg_xlog" and "internal/pg_clog". Keep the name but move it
> out of sight.
I disagree that this will materially help with the issue.
> We have a tool called pg_xlogdump in the standard installation. initdb
> has an option --xlogdir, pg_basebackup has --xlog and others. Renaming
> the xlog directory would make this all a bit confusing, unless we're
> prepared to rename the programs and options as well.
pg_xlogdump is not a user-facing tool, frankly, so I don't believe we
should be terribly concerned about either leaving it named as-is or
renaming it. I agree that we should consider adding alternative names
to the options for initdb and pg_basebackup.
|Next Message||Heikki Linnakangas||2016-10-14 12:08:57||Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol|
|Previous Message||Christoph Berg||2016-10-14 11:11:51||Re: process type escape for log_line_prefix|