Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix
Date: 2016-10-14 11:04:36
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Stephen Frost 2016-10-12 <20161012190732(dot)GJ13284(at)tamriel(dot)snowman(dot)net>
> For my 2c, I'd rather have %m, but I definitely agree with Robert that
> we need to do *something* here and if the only thing holding us back is
> %t vs. %m, then let's just pick one and move on. I'll just hold my nose
> when I see the default and change it to %m.

Here's the very same patch with %m instead of %t. Pick one :)

(Fwiw, I'm still leaning towards %t, but my eyes are becoming more and
more accustomed to %m as well. I'd be fine with it as well. (I'd
rather want to try to get rid of the timezone identifier there...))


Attachment Content-Type Size
log_line_prefix_m text/plain 2.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2016-10-14 11:11:51 Re: process type escape for log_line_prefix
Previous Message Mario De Frutos Dieguez 2016-10-14 10:57:43 Re: signal handling in plpython